An undesirable aspect of Religion?

Can we make someone a God and at the same time; punish Him for not listening to our owes.

Because by doing that we would be invalidating, the omnipotence of God, and why would we be ready to believe in such a God, who is not omnipotent? In my opinion, this is where religion attempts to hide its true color.

Even if we are wrong; we must not pay heed to our being wrong? And, we shall rather make it a Philosophy [*] than be willing to realize our fallacies, as a mere mistake, we shall invent yet another, to feel the solace; of human innovation in continuing the infinitude of stupidity, that might sound otherwise intellectual and philosophical in its fervor?

[*] Philosophy; God, who shall be revered, for all time to come, in sickness and in health, do we part ways from Him, upon realizing that God is futile, we shall not punish Him, with our weird power, rather we shall subjugate ourselves to the infallibility of God, and therefore the limitations of our own being, rejecting any intellectual forms of inspirations; that questions the moral of such.

ଭଗବାନନ୍କ ନିର୍ଭୁଲ ମୟତା ହେତୁ ଆମେ କ୍ଷୁଦ୍ର କିମ୍ବା ଶକ୍ତି-ସାପେକ୍ଷ ନୁହନ୍ତି ବରଂଚ ଭଗବାନନ୍କ ସହ ଏହାର କୌଣସି ସମ୍ଭନ୍ଧ ନାହିଁ. ଭଗବାନନ୍କ ଅସ୍ତିତ୍ବ ଆମର କ୍ଷୁଦ୍ରତା କିମ୍ବା ଶକ୍ତି ର ପରିସୀମା କୁ ନିର୍ନୟ କରି ନ ଥାଏ.

Comments

2 responses to “An undesirable aspect of Religion?”

  1. Brian Champness Avatar
    Brian Champness

    Quote from above: “God, who shall be revered for all time to come”.
    Why? And which God?

    Like

    1. Mohan Avatar
      Mohan

      1. God is doctrined to be revered in any religion I know. 2. which God: any God as long as he is revered and therefore all Gods.

      Like

Leave a comment