I came across the following on FB. Its not the first time I have come across such prejudiced view of the world we live in, irrespective of whether its a western view or an eastern view. But its not right and we must not accept such perjury of ethical concerns. Its kind of order of the western myopia, that it paints everything with the same brush, as long as its not western. We must be cognizant of it and dispel such myth from our Psyche.
Here is his confident perjury.
American Women are not repressed. Would you like to see true repression I turn your gaze towards 95% of women in Saudi Arabia, rural China, India, other nations of similar configurations, those are a gender ‘repressed. If you do not have to ask permission to leave your house then you are not ‘repressed.
— Eric Kirsch.
So cutting your napes in certain way makes you liberals? Explains whats wrong with the western view of the world.
1. I do agree that repression of women in India is rampant. But 95% you gotta be kidding me. Where do you get such numbers except from your wildly self gratifying hokum. More…
BERLIN: Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban defended his hardline stance against refugees, the vast majority of whom are Muslim, saying in an interview published on Friday that Islam “has never been part of Europe”.
“Islam has never been part of Europe, it came to us,”
1. What Taslima Nasreen now has to say about such foolhardy Islamophobia? She might fall out of favor with Europe?
2. Why US has to thrust itself in the middle east to bring world order when such aggressors are doing the same thing elsewhere. “we do in Hungary what we want to do”. Then who decides what has to be done in the Middle East? Definitely Hungary is not interested, but why it wants a sit in the UN? It can keep its secluded presence only in Hungary.
3. Islam came to Europe. Europe didn’t come to Islam. Well what about European imperialism? You can thrust yourself into others house when you don’t want them in yours? More…
From Foundation texts of Buddhism.
Abhaya Sutta and
Samaññaphala Sutta etc
As I summarize (6 sentences into 1, possible)
Most of the speech — including bitter truth, can only be said if they are beneficial and only if they are said with the right sense of time.
I am making it concise, from whats appended still below;
unfactual, untrue, unbeneficial, unendearing and disagreeable to others, DON’T SAY
factual, true, yet unbeneficial, unendearing and disagreeable to others, DON’T SAY
factual, true, beneficial, yet unendearing and disagreeable to others, SAY, ONLY AT PROPER TIME
unfactual, untrue, unbeneficial, yet endearing and agreeable to others, DON’T SAY
factual, true, but unbeneficial, yet endearing and agreeable to others, DON’T SAY
factual, true, beneficial, and endearing and agreeable to others, SAY, ONLY AT PROPER TIME
हमारे आशा हमारे निराशाओं से बहुत ही छोटी है, कद और उम्र में. ये अभी अभी आयी है. मज़हब ने हमें क्या दिया? सिर्फ निराशा. एक भ्रम, जिसने कायर को शायर कहा और गंदे को महात्मा बताया और ढोंगी को बापू बताया. सब आशा के नाम पर निराशा ही दिया. हमें आशा कि तहकीकात नहीं निराशा कि करनी चाहिए. अपने आशा कि सुंदर सपनों को गिरने से पहले निराशा कि लम्बी ईमारत मज़हब को भूल ना चाहिए. यह एक बिलासमय हिंसा हे, मज़हब . मज़हब एक बिलासमय हिंसा है, यह सिर्फ ध्वंस के तरफ रुख करती हे , क्योंकि यह एक साजिश है, सुन्दर तथा कलात्मक सारे अभिब्यक्ति जो आप में, मुझ में, उनमें, किसी में भी आ सकती है, उसके तरफ एक असहिस्णुता कि तथा अंधकार से प्रेरित असुरक्ष्या कि भाबना को कायम करने कि. इसे पहचानो और इस से दूर हो जाओ.
myth: science needs massive funding, religion is a charity.
fact: science needs reasonable funding, with 100 $ you will do education that can’t be done with 10000 $ of preaching.
fact: religious charity is equivalent to keeping the mass at injurious level of lack of education, which is used to exploit them financially which is a massive scandal. So charity is a business.
Why sex is often used against opponents? There are two most competitive and perhaps the most leading behavior of us human beings. 1. Intimacy, which in its most nonsensical form is sex. 2. Creating and harboring opponents to prove our OWN supremacy.
Is it needful to say that our nonsensical intimacy has procreated and sustained us but our innate desire to kill or vanquish others has nonetheless kept us competitive because lest it only the one that hatches a conspiracy first will have an edge. We strike back not only at our extra-species opponents but at our own species in order to savior ourselves against nature’s odds. More…