Category: neutrino
-
3 anomalies in 3 weeks.
This article tries to put on record exactly why OPERA neutrino anomaly, FLYBY of Galileo anomaly and PIONEER anomalies are not at-all anomalies, based upon my research from late 2011. On 25.11.2013 I sat for couple hours and reviewed the article written from 2011 and added contents. Since I am reading after couple of years…
-
Energy-time uncertainty is a distance-time and speed-time uncertainty.
OPERA sees 7.5 km/s fallout which goes above photon-speed. This will be consistent with Relativity if they incurred a larger error on their energy while at the same time keeping their time uncertainty between 1 to 10 nanosecs. SO they need to show us their energy distribution with uncertainties …
-
The energy loss of OPERA neutrino, aberration, rest the anomaly.
There were only two articles I had written countering Cohen and Glashow’s famous paper that had claimed a refutation of OPERA experiment. (Where? In your dreams?) I had written some critical reports on Van Elburg’s hilarious paper. Van Elburg’s name was removed from Wikipedia article –probably because better late than never it was realized that…
-
Relativistic energy loss — especially for OPERA neutrino experiment.
Using basic Time-Energy relation of Quantum Mechanics (or uncertainity. equation) I had shown why Sheldon Glashow’s bremstrahllung scheme corresponds to a different energy-distance scale than OPERA but this explanation is Relativity and quantum mechanics together, against Sheldon Glashow
-
What is the (f)utility of Sheldon Glashow’s paper towards OPERA result.
The MeV corresponds to ~10^-26 seconds, a 100 million part of an atto-second, that is, if a real electron is clading the value of energy by being misidentified or some state-of-the-science measurement artefact, in that case our Nano-second range GPS clocks would be no good. The neutrino and photons would be ticking at far below…
M Dash Foundation: C Cube Learning 