Category: Science
-
Just a note on signal analysis
I was thinking about this a little..well from experience of the past decade (mostly more tha 3 years ago): When high energy physicists impose their selection criteria they usually think by making such criterion very tight (strict cuts) they end up removing more background and by increasing the figure of merit they have a clean…
-
Remarks about the 144 GeV bump found in CDF data analysis
The first comments follow the discussion at this blog link: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/04/06/anomalies-at-fermilab/comment-page-1/#comment-158561 A few things are wrong here with some remarks (and misunderstanding) I point out one misunderstanding: the bump is a tail moving slowly as per Monte Carlo. “The bump is clearly a Gaussian so we can’t say it’s a tail that’s moving slowly because…
-
Monte Carlo: we expect snakes here.
Monte Carlo: we expect snakes here. 1 Sigma: Isn’t that a tail? 2 Sigma: yes that’s a tail, but is that a snake? 3 sigma: thats definitely the tail, but did you see the hood? 4 Sigma: that’s a rattle snake. 5 Sigma: it bites you, you die.
-
ARE SIMULATIONS LAWS OF NATURE?
Universe may be using simulation to predict the future…that makes all the accidents and uncertainties possible. Universe itself may not know all its constraints and is trying to find out as it evolves, that may be the nature of “Laws of Universe” it does nort defy the formulation of quantum mechanics…that Simulations are part of laws…