If you are to come out of a NET that traps you. Stratagem. Reply

If you are to come out of a NET that traps you. Stratagem.

This article is purported to be helpful towards those who take Indian after the university entrance exam known as NET (National Eligibility test governed by CSIR; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) twice every year. [Science NET is known as CSIR-NET and arts/humanities as UGC-NET.]

Manmohan sir, I want to qualify net. … any suggestions ?

I am assuming you will take the test in June 2018.

Solve 10 previous papers thoroughly.

Make a categorization of subject wise weightage: eg mathematical physics, quantum mechanics, thermodynamics etc.

Set yourself a good score based on what you think you can certainly achieve. Make a 15% increase and make that your target.

See your strongest subjects and make a plan which ones you want to be thoroughly prepared about so you can arrive your target.

Never attempt a question, unless you are very sure of it. Negative marks in net can ruin your chances. (By attempt I mean: select the choice)

Decide in which section you want to score how much.

In section A (total marks 30) try to achieve full marks, except a few daunting questions. Getting 22 (11 questions right, assuming no negative score) seems a good idea. In section B (20 questions in total) try as many as you would like, to comply with your target. eg if your target is 110/200 you already got 22. So lets say you think you can score 35 in sec B (10 questions right, no negative) then you have 57 by now. So rest 53 must come from sec C, which is about 11 questions right, without negative scoring. You can vary between sec B and C to fulfill a particular target.

You should take mock tests frequently. Take a previous year question paper, set yourself 3 exam like hours without disturbance and attempt the paper. Now analyse your responses, based on the answer sheet. This way you can gauge yourself properly.

Once you have solved 5 sets of question papers, you know exactly what to be expected in the exam. eg exactly what kind of quantum mechanics questions and so on.

Brush up your concepts thoroughly based on this, from good quality texts. I will give you selection of text books, in the end. Also try to solve good number of questions from these texts. When studying the text focus on the text, not necessarily on exam. So test your understanding based on chapter-end questions. Solve them yourself. If you can’t try to find if solution manual is available. Some texts have answers available, full solutions that is.

Do proper time management, eg skip difficult or lengthy answer type questions for 2nd round. First attempt what you can solve quickly. Here by attempt I mean actually solving the question and not just selecting any choice. Also attempt first, questions, where you are thoroughly prepared. Then go to what you think you can do but requires long amount of time. Then go to attempt what you might think you may not solve but give a shot. Now review your answers for any possible mistakes.

When using scribble pad make each question have a separate space, so you can easily review later, you can leave some space to each questions space, so you can add some calculations during review.

Now go onto solve more and more questions from good study materials. Not necessarily coaching materials. It could be Schaum’s series or a good text book. Keep on taking mock tests to gauge your preparedness and requirements.

Here are some text books to follow, they are my favorite and most of them are quite helpful from NET prospective as well.

A. Mathematical Physics: 1. Mary L. Boas. 2. Riley Hobson.

B. Classical Mechanics: 1. Takwale Puranik, 2. Rana, Joag. 3. Mathur 4. Gupta (the latter two include properties of matter and wave etc)

C. Modern Physics: 1. (one stop) Arthur Beiser. 2. Eisberg and Resnick (book name: quantum mechanics of atoms molecules etc)

D. Electromagnetic Theory 1. Hecht (optics book) 2. Griffith (Ed book) 3. Berkley series (author: Purcell) 4. Mahajan Choudhury (Ed text)

E. Solid State Physics 1. Ali Omar 2. Kittel 3. Beiser (mod physics text)

F. Nuclear Physics 1. Kenneth S. Krane 2. Cohen 3. Prasad 4. Gupta

G. Electronics, Digital electronics 1. author Malvino, Leach, Saha 2. RS Sedha (S. Chand) Analog electronics; 1. VK Mehta 2. Malvino Bates 3 Tayal and Tyagi

H. Quantum Mechanics: Griffith 2. Levi (applied quantum mechanics) 3. Joachain (Pearson)

I. Statistical Mechanics 1. Reif (Berkley physics course, A must for everyone) 2. Pathria Beale (Advanced level, but thoroughly descriptive)

J. Thermodynamics 1. Garg Bansal 2. Zeemansky Dittman 3. University physics (Sears, Zeemansky et al)

You can see/refer difficult texts like Arfken, Jackson or Goldstein on a need basis.

Relativity; follow that thin book Resnick and Arthur Beiser would also help.

I hope that helps.

Inherent ability = difficulty * accomplishment. 2

All of Physics is this “Inherent ability = difficulty * accomplishment”. Thats just intuitive but can easily be seen to correspond mathematically with the Principle of least action.

First the edifice: whats the problem? The problem is given you move in straight line when every direction is same around you, which direction will you chose? While you are waiting for a good answer from astrologers intelligent people already give a good hint. Think you have some inherent ability which is fixed.

fixed: which changes only if estimated wrong.

That inherent ability is actually action. Accomplishments are adjusted for difficulties, you waded through a swamp 5 meters you would have accomplished in sand 8 meters with that given inherent ability called action. Because action is abstract we have been sticking to time and path-length, but they are not as fundamental, they are merely specifics. More…

A c++ code for calculating pi value. Reply

Finally I am successful in calculating pi value — less than 0.3% error, by using random number generation. Although my computer needs some fixation on its compiler or path definition etc, there are very good online compilers which helps in testing and running c++ codes: try the given link.

Computing the value of pi using std::rand()
Enter number of trials: 10000
Enter number of random (x,y) points per trial: 10
pi = 3.14376 +- 0.00519107
average – exact = 0.00216735
CPU time = 0.004027 secs

Here is the code I found by searching a good deal on the web. Yes I did tinker around but only because my own compiler (Turbo C++ on windows 10, 64 bits) was throwing some exceptions on the included headers.

using namespace std;

double pi_estimate(const unsigned long points) More…

Coriolis Force; An interesting idea. 3

I have been thinking of writing a basic introduction, on this important physical concept — of, what’s a Coriolis Force.

Its one of the interesting ideas of physics, which does not get as much of a mention, unless you just happen to know this, because of your advance footing, in the discourses of Physics; perhaps because its two orders of magnitude smaller, in its strength, compared to relevant forces, in a situation, that involves this small — but, significantly measurable force.

So, what’s a Coriolis Force?

I presume that most of us would be aware of, what’s centrifugal force. Its in this connection, that, a Coriolis force is most understandable.

So, what’s a centrifugal force?

A Centrifugal force, comes into picture, every time a centripetal force comes into consideration. A centrifugal force is the corresponding pseudo force, of a centripetal force. So, for every centripetal force there would be a corresponding centrifugal force.

So, we need to shed light on a few things, before we understand, what are Coriolis Force. We need to therefore discuss; what are pseudo forces and what’s a centripetal or a centrifugal force, then a coriolis force would be clearer, to the root.

So lets begin with Force.

Force has a basic standing in Physics, in connection to, in what frames of reference we need to measure such a physical quantity, as are all other physical quantities to be measured, have a significance, as to; in what frames of reference we are measuring these quantities in. More…

The angular parameters of celestial mechanics ! Reply

Define an Hour Circle.

Its a bit tricky to define some astronomical parameters and not run into innocent looking misrepresentations of facts. One needs to cool his amber more times than there are parameters, then one gets a feel where and how to begin and give a good description.

Hour Circle is a GREAT Circle, on a celestial sphere ** that, at the same time, passes through one of the celestial poles. Hence it passes through both of the celestial poles*.

A great circle is a circle that passes on a sphere, so that its radius (or diameter) equals to the radius (or diameter ) of that sphere.

If the great circle goes through one of the poles (– so both poles as an imminent condition of this definition) its also called a meridian and this circles’s angular reference wrt one of all possible meridians is called a longitude angle, or simply longitude. More…

Stars and Fate. Reply

Astrology is the blind belief that stars change our fate — pun; like the blind belief wives change our personality. This is where Physics becomes a paraphernalia of whim, cultivated over the ages, to bring solace in seeking ignorance as a means of existential glory.

I just checked some scientific terms, in regards to how they have been made to work like paraphernalia to produce different astrological system. I was not shocked that Indians have kept advanced strides in one branch of knowledge — or the lack-thereof; Astrology.

Guess what? Hindu Astrology is a Sidereal Astrology, hence much advance than Western Astrology, which is a tropical astrology. This we have often taken boastfully, to mean that Indian science is advanced and far-reaching, even from the times of Vedas, but the simple facts — of my conviction, are; we have been manipulative from a very early time in our civilization’s evolution.

We just took science to produce religion. We also took religion to produce myth, and myth to produce social customs and took social customs to downplay science. Why else is “western” science advanced and we are merely a laggard participant in its various glorification.

— Of-course I don’t have words of solace to those who disagree, if like kids we assign ourselves the fancy of winning every sports, that we do not even take part in, because our parents will succumb to that whimsical demand of ours, it wouldn’t work towards science, here we have to work nonetheless, take part in each and every detail and each and every aspect, its not sufficient or even necessary to just downplay the impact of criticism. More…