Why I think religion is a subversion of science ?

— And look at the wording; subverted, subversion: another version, ha.

— A deliberate attempt, I would say, although over such a time, that, you wouldn’t notice it.

Lets talk Nirvana — which is a hyper-anointed word for mukti or freedom.

Here is the hindu philosophy about Nirvana — some hyper puritans of religious over knowledge might disagree, its Buddhist, they would say, at some times I can not really distinguish, but what does internet do, a lot of perversion at the least.

A person is borne as a human being. That SAME person goes through a cycle of death and birth.

Do we realize such an idea is anti-scientific, because its a subverted idea?

This cycle goes through thousands of circulation. I learned as a kid, barely 3 or 4 years old, this idea; that your life goes through an immense number of cycles, into various “Joni” — a reference to any particular species as we would call it scientifically. There is a nice anecdote about it, why it was so significant for me that I learned such an idea, at that age, if I write it up, I will certainly link it up here.

This person, that goes through such joni eg a tiger’s life, is a Tiger Joni, and a Dog’s is a dog joni, and joni is something like progeny? Yes. This life I am a human, previous life I was a camel and I wasn’t making so many jokes about my own toes and so on, the next life I will be into a raccoon’s joni, but its the same person who is tagged and condemned, to be born into this cycle of jonies, by default.