Category: Research

  • Bad news for OPERA.

    Confirm, after I fixed some error-analysis ( — binomial coefficient and error analysis) and fixed the speed-of-light-unit calculations I see that OPERA-experiment does not even need to look beyond what error they might have done. ~1 part per billion of eV (ppb) error on their neutrino-mass equivalent to ~274 ppm of 1 eV error on…

  • UPDATE TO: OPERA has lost it’s claim of superluminal neutrino.

    UPDATE TO: OPERA has lost it’s claim of superluminal neutrino.

    A stringent constraint on OPERA speed-excess: Planck’s constant = 6.6 10^(-7) eV-nanosecond; A neutrino mass of 2 eV has to be measured to better than 1.15 eV to see any superluminal excess. — After I fixed mistakes in my binomial-expansion. At or above this error you see (7.5 + >= 7.5 ) km/second, you can…

  • I claim that, OPERA has lost; it’s claim of superluminal neutrino.

    I claim that, OPERA has lost; it’s claim of superluminal neutrino.

    My finding was thus, as you see in the equation described in the above analysis (image), if OPERA finds it’s neutrino with energy-error in the order of 1 eV such that its time-error is in the order of 1 nanosecond it will see speed excess (or anomaly) in the order of 7.5 km/second consistent with…

  • Energy-time uncertainty is a distance-time and speed-time uncertainty.

    Energy-time uncertainty is a distance-time and speed-time uncertainty.

    OPERA sees 7.5 km/s fallout which goes above photon-speed. This will be consistent with Relativity if they incurred a larger error on their energy while at the same time keeping their time uncertainty between 1 to 10 nanosecs. SO they need to show us their energy distribution with uncertainties …

  • The energy loss of OPERA neutrino, aberration, rest the anomaly.

    The energy loss of OPERA neutrino, aberration, rest the anomaly.

    There were only two articles I had written countering Cohen and Glashow’s famous paper that had claimed a refutation of OPERA experiment. (Where? In your dreams?) I had written some critical reports on Van Elburg’s hilarious paper. Van Elburg’s name was removed from Wikipedia article –probably because better late than never it was realized that…