M Dash Foundation: C Cube Learning

Tag: relativity

  • Photo-Electric Effect, Quantum Mechanics, Quantization, Wave Particle Duality !!

    The fact that zero mass particles exist simply might be a coincidence of nature, that a very small energy was produced randomly. Again since it transmitted a longer distance or infinite distance might only happen for EM force only because of the nature of phenomena. Probably we need to think more why, what are any…

  • Rising Oceanic Levels

    If you use that idea here you can see that 3 mm/year is really not a concern if they haven’t used the Relativistic corrections to their satelite data. But if they have taken all Relativistic effects which per a year can be really a large value compared to 3 mm/year then 3 mm/year can be…

  • The energy loss of OPERA neutrino, aberration, rest the anomaly.

    The energy loss of OPERA neutrino, aberration, rest the anomaly.

    There were only two articles I had written countering Cohen and Glashow’s famous paper that had claimed a refutation of OPERA experiment. (Where? In your dreams?) I had written some critical reports on Van Elburg’s hilarious paper. Van Elburg’s name was removed from Wikipedia article –probably because better late than never it was realized that…

  • How time dilation on GPS clocks is induced by static and spinning earth observations.

    How time dilation on GPS clocks is induced by static and spinning earth observations.

    The image above shows earth at an altitude of 20200 + 9.08 km. The red line I drew is a straight line of 696 km, 3-D straight line — perhaps non-Euclidean, near the CERN – Gran Sasso Baseline, parallel to the latter, which is not straight and about 733 km long. — Isn’t that a…

  • OPERA neutrino anomaly, from Gravitational contribution.

    OPERA neutrino anomaly, from Gravitational contribution.

    This is original research work of Manmohan Dash, first published here on 6 November 2011. 12:13 pm. an important update; OPERA neutrino anomaly, from Gravitational contribution. Update, correction; Here we will have to multiply the Gravitational shift by a 19.758 (4.4451*4.4451), as the 4.44 went to the denominator, instead of the numerator. A funny mistake,…