Category: new experiment/theory results

  • I claim that, OPERA has lost; it’s claim of superluminal neutrino.

    I claim that, OPERA has lost; it’s claim of superluminal neutrino.

    My finding was thus, as you see in the equation described in the above analysis (image), if OPERA finds it’s neutrino with energy-error in the order of 1 eV such that its time-error is in the order of 1 nanosecond it will see speed excess (or anomaly) in the order of 7.5 km/second consistent with…

  • What OPERA overlooked in their analysis of neutrino speed

    I, like OPERA set uncertainty on neutrino mass to be zero and it’s nominal mass to be 2 eV. This gives me for an energy uncertainty of ~0.01 eV a speed of ~7 km/s. That is the excess speed they see is a result of the error they make on energy or distance because uncertainty…

  • OPERA anomaly might be out for good.

    OPERA anomaly might be out for good.

    Quantum mechanics is such a powerful tool it makes all powers fools. You do not have to measure the distance of the CERN – Gran Sasso distance to mm accuracy. This is already measured and inherent in the data-analysis of OPERA. Being an experimental particle physicist I know exactly where. It is inherent in the…

  • Energy-time uncertainty is a distance-time and speed-time uncertainty.

    Energy-time uncertainty is a distance-time and speed-time uncertainty.

    OPERA sees 7.5 km/s fallout which goes above photon-speed. This will be consistent with Relativity if they incurred a larger error on their energy while at the same time keeping their time uncertainty between 1 to 10 nanosecs. SO they need to show us their energy distribution with uncertainties …

  • The actual energy errors OPERA team is making

    The actual energy errors OPERA team is making: 3.4062 x 10 (-2) eV, QM >= 6.582×10^-7 eV for 1-nanosec time accuracy,{OPERA ideal} QM >= 6.582×10^-8 eV for 10-nanosec time accuracy,{OPERA syst. and stat.} QM >= 6.582×10^-9 eV for 100-nanosec time accuracy {irrelevant}