ancient language formula – Page 2 – M Dash Foundation: C Cube Learning

September 3, 2012July 14, 2015

How to recognize words in various languages … a magic formula

1. the languages are “read” into Roman. Roman without any particular rules not defined is arbitrary. That is it becomes neutral, devoid of biases from language rules. It unlocks the languages into their neutral forms.

The languages are basically a rule or lock defined to capture particular meanings from a vast arbitrary tract of phonetics and noise. eg roman: t corresponds to 4 locks in Indian Language system and two locks in Japanese. t as in tatami, t as in taberu are the soft t and heavy t in Japanese. But in Indian t as in tumhara, t as in tenis, t as in thoda and t as in beithak are 4 different locks, 2 soft and 2 heavy.

But in Roman they are all but t. Note that English is not Roman. English is simply a hidden phonetics where you know what the lock is, but you do not show it explicitly. eg time is English, but in Indian lock its thaim, with t in thaim same as the t locked in beithak.

July 7, 2012July 7, 2012

10-incarnations [da-s-avatara] in Sanskrut and Japanese

Note how close the 10-incarnations of Bishnu = Narayana= Nara, are in Indian and Japanese. they retain at-least one monosyllable or more, which could mean the 10-incarnation system was developed much later and is a compilation from philosiphical and mythical school of thoughts prevalent up until now, but thesame linguistic system existed much before. I took this project 30 min ago and done.

July 7, 2012

Indian languages are monosyllabic contrary to whats known

In-fact this I have realized year or two before and few things were written in this website in teh last 1-2 years in this regard. And here is why Indian language has to be monosyllabic. 1. India is in Asia and almost all major countries through ages have monosyllabic nature. eg Chinese is monosyllabic and its present in major nations of Asia including Japan where the latter is very-well clsoe in the spoken words. There are many example, the last article: “kyomizu dera” is perhaps simply so in Indian as well “khyamisu dera” with recognition that “khyamisu = forgiving God”

June 29, 2012July 14, 2015

Comparing Hiragana and Indian alphabet !

Indian Consonants have an internal vowel, a, not present in Hiragana [Japanese native alphabet]. This is also true in Katakana. [Japanese alphabet for imported phonetics or non native words]

That means 39 base consonants (of India), will be all said in a different way, which could not be accommodated by Hiragana or Katakana. So, I think this is just one vowel more, for Hiragana.

The Hiragana a is actually an abbreviated aa of Indian sound-base.

The other differences from Hiragana are how {hu, fu} are said the same way, but note that, in the alphabet itself {hu, bu, pu, fu} are a set of degenerated consonant and also so in Indian system. That means for hiragana these elements are simply similar and this fact reflects with the same symbol denoting the 4 elements, with small difference accommodated

September 17, 2011

Language connections points to an underlying beauty..

Language connections are much more unbelievably simple than our day to day attitude towards them reflects. Everything evolves from a fewer set of things. The underlying beauty of the seemingly bizzare properties are only a diversion. Nature isn’t playing tricks. We are not prepared to take a route which promises us sound understanding of the inherent unity for fear of losing a dime of our ability to prove that we are capable of the immensely complex. You got to be kidding me: (well !!) The word for dwarfs in India is “baman” (a little variant of “wa mono”). (There are variants of this into; Hindi: bau-na, Odia: banTu, with the T being a heavier phonetic of t, so in transLIT rules people add H’s, in Odia and other Indianic modern alphabet systems there are 1st and 2nd letters of many letters which takes care of such phenomena and the additional dots are used to address further degeneracy) It is literally