To Physicists … A question in mind !

To Physicists: do you think “it would be a new invention that uncertainty relations do not (necessarily) follow from non-commutation, the non-commutation leading to uncertainty relations was just one possible way of proving that simple relations between such non-commuting variables [e.g. momentum and position] exist.

One of the reasons for this could be; such uncertainty relations might generally also exist between commuting variables [such as distance and energy ], maybe nobody has checked if distance and energy also do not commute ? in consistency with the non-commutation of energy-time ?

eg an energy variable has in it already all of the following: distance, time, their ratio = velocity and momentum [and mass]. Which means automatically, there is a contribution of each of those variables into energy, hence an uncertainty of energy automatically extends to same in distance and momentum and so on.

An energy-time uncertainty essentially means therefore a distance-time uncertainty [although more complicated than simply in the minimum, in order of h-cross].

So the non-commutation of energy-time must also be, I think, translated into distance-time. [– I have shown this in my OPERA draft and other analysis articles]

The fact that such an uncertainty exists between distance and time is exactly worked out by me, but any non-commutation nature between distance and time is not checked. [are they non-commuting? I am saying they were never checked perhaps but they are non-commuting. This follows from their dependence definition from energy. But stand-alone we may be using commutation of distance and time]

So there is a correlation between various variables in a physical system, and commuting variables may actually due to this correlation behave like non-commuting ones, leading to new forms of uncertainty relations, not necessarily and most likely not; in terms of h-cross.

This may actually be a clarion call for the remaining inconsistencies of Quantum-Relativity.  [This one eg explains OPERA anomaly, fuzziness of pictures taken by camera etc .. much explained in the last 1 year on my website ]

I have also worked out the uncertainty relations from wave-particle duality [mostly]

Apart from some other articles they are described here, here and here, … last one could be slightly tricky

I am an experimental particle physicist, traveler, teacher, researcher, scientist and communicator of ideas. I am a quarkist and a bit quirky ! Hypothesis non fingo, eppur si muove, dubito cogito ergo sum are things that turn me on ! Researcher in experimental high energy physics (aka elementary particle physics; like “quarks, leptons & mesons and baryons”) … Teacher of Physics (and occasionally chemistry and maths) Blogger (check my website; mdashf.org) ! Love to read read and read but only stuff that interest me. Love to puff away my time in frivolities, just dreaming and may be thinking. Right now desperately trying to streamline myself.

One thought on “To Physicists … A question in mind !

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s