Being careless in chosing a boyfriend, how much can you afford it !

If you are to chose boy friends, of which there are M in number (with their ratings, but not known to you yet), how many times you are allowed to be careless in choosing them, so that you can still have the best “rated boyfriend” average.

D = √2(M+1) – 1.

[After you have been careless D number of times, your rating average will suffer if you don’t pick a high rate one, in the next choice]

So if you are running through a sample of 7 boy friends, you get a maximum chance of 3, to be careless.

Feynman Algorithm Feynman originally related this probability to ‘rated’ and ‘unrated’ meals.

You can chose girlfriends, books, partners, politicians, any set of PMs and so on, based on this statistical guide and check your average rating.

I am an experimental particle physicist, traveler, teacher, researcher, scientist and communicator of ideas. I am a quarkist and a bit quirky ! Hypothesis non fingo, eppur si muove, dubito cogito ergo sum are things that turn me on ! Researcher in experimental high energy physics (aka elementary particle physics; like “quarks, leptons & mesons and baryons”) … Teacher of Physics (and occasionally chemistry and maths) Blogger (check my website; ! Love to read read and read but only stuff that interest me. Love to puff away my time in frivolities, just dreaming and may be thinking. Right now desperately trying to streamline myself.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s