new ideas of language – "Invariance" from M Dash Foundation

Can we have only one language for the world?

July 13, 2015 Mohan, mdashf

Can we have only one language for the world?

See the following German words, (… and corresponding Indian words).

You would think Indo-Europian theory of language is valid. But still such a theory might be adhoc and simply a manipulation of what we see in a few instances.

In my years of analysis of words and phonetics (and alternation of elements etc) this is what I observed.

There are two categories.

The first prefers Sanskrit as a language, or even any source.

The second one prefers arbitrary factors, what I call sun theory, it can be called as a Sanskrit hypothesis, that is analysis can lead to matching + unification, but not any particular language. I am for the latter.

“I can’t believe” !

July 9, 2015 Mohan, mdashf

These tricks are not exclusive to Japanese alphabet. I also used them to match with Odia alphabet and south Indian alphabet to remember. Check this out !

い ଇ ಇ ఇ

The “i” [said as e, as in english] has a component which is partially same (two circles, if extrapolated) in Japanese, Odia, Kannada, Telugu. That is actually how I remembered. Even in Odia, Kannada and Telugu the “i-symbol” is same.

Check: ଦି ದಿ ది [I have written phonetics di as in “the” in Odia, Kannada and Telugu] The vowel “i” which is written as a symbol on top of the letter is same in all cases, so that helps to remember what the letter is reading. [I already know my native speak Odia, so its much easier for me to remember this way]

A serendipity can lead to unification !!

May 12, 2013 Mohan, mdashf

FOR unification of language read this article: the-approach-to-unify-language Couple of weeks ago I was checking random words on GT. I checked eg 4 in 66 languages

The approach to unify Language.

May 11, 2013 Mohan, mdashf

The thought of Sun theory of language is “äny word is an alphabet.” Therefore there are infinite number of languages and infinite number of rules of language and infinite number of alphabet. Therefore humanity has only learned to produce new alphabets, and a word is the way to do it. If I say damn, it says: d, a, m, n is an alphabet. alphabet; literal meaning is miniaturization. {therefore quantization} because alpha means less/ap/ab {ap as in apapsis, alpa as in Indianic: alpayu} and bat/bet is adjective-suffix of alpa. {as English: LY in nicely}

Chinese/Japanese and hypothesis of Sanscrit

October 13, 2012 Mohan, mdashf

here are some Japanese/Chinese words that are almost same or exactly same in English. {回向、意向、真} Ekō, ikō, zhēn {echo, ego, genuine} They were right away uplifted like seven 7 [=shi-ven from shi-chi =七] [not necessarily stolen, stolen is something where you take it, borrow it, take it as help and later deny it and claim its yours]

These are just remarkable examples. You can find plenty more if you do some research ..

Some interesting findings in ‘kanji”.

September 28, 2012 Mohan, mdashf

See how, English: Rely comes from Chinese: Lai = trust .. (because they are same phonetically and have same meaning, no doubt they are cognates and in-fact same source of the word). Japanese: rai is the same word as Chinese lai, also connected through the kanji: 頼 (rai, lai). This only tells the kanjis were followed and so were the phonetics, given to how Japan does not L. China does, India does, Europe does. But that might be originated in the imperial pasts of these countries. If not its still an exception. But shin 信 (as said above) and rai 頼, as here from lai 頼 also get combined to form a new word shinrai, 信頼, in case of Japanese, with same meaning as both shin and rai, TRUST. shin = rai = lai = shinrai = rely = trust, shin = xin = (ya)kin. It is the same word. Can there even be an doubt? (of-course no-one knew this so far, and sorry, as a scientists its not my renunciation responsibility to make sure facts are known before, we investigate and we find amazing stuff, painstakingly)

1 2 3 »