Nature is a rule-book, immensely complex, gigantic and subtle … 3

We live in a time when our most beautiful theory of the physical world, quantum mechanics, is about a century old. Well it was mostly developed in the 1920s and 30s and some of its most brilliant development and expositions were developed in the 1960s and 70s.

As we learn it from Stephen Hawking, an extraordinarily brilliant theoretical physicist of the last century, who conveys to us the most central and comprehensive understanding of our journey so far, in physics and possibly in everything we can be proud of, in his characteristic humor and clarity, the study of the universe and nature continues today, to the yet unsuccessful yet comprehensive, sporadic, M theory, brane theory, string theory etc, quantum mechanics or at least its unification promises are still in the agenda of the most competitive and fund raising efforts of theoretical physics.

Experimental physics on the other hand, despite of its tremendous carvings into the working of the some of the most straining problems of particle physics and the related fields, has failed to give an account as marvelous as that of Hawking.

Hawking is a marvel precisely because of this suave expositions of his in the forms of masterpieces, 6 of which are lying by my table right now.

I purchased them from a local bookstore. A shock that I had in this process is, I hardly found any books by Feynman in the shelves of this store, except the tips on physics. The store-tender seemed to know Feynman best sellers and it’s likely that the books are all out of sale. (out of stock)

Or who knows, given the disparaged attitude of the Local Readers Diaspora and the fact that they purchase their books from various localities of the globe, it may even, has happened so, that the Hawking best sellers have somehow won over the other best sellers.

Einstein had a similar fate as that of Feynman.

And look at the fact that this region has so called physicists (or the politically correct, career physicists) all spread out across the globe and they can buy their books from wherever they want to, may be from an Amazon, Barnes Nobles outlet.

This region neither has any of those, outlets, nor scholars or career physicists, who are truly inspired about all the present day affairs of Physics. Partly because Internet is cheap and has an access to everything on the likes of Wikipedia, they give it into their often-chanted “Dho”.

[Pun intended, dho is the local onomatopoeia of “bang” as in I don’t give a bang. For the uninitiated to the jargon of this region that roughly translates into English, as, I don’t give a bang.]

We are a country people and we have made it to liberalization. That’s our triumph in this century. This M* guy is just too sensed up about everything.

So we do live in a time, when quantum mechanics is actually not making it much into our psyche, given it’s a well carved out niche, on the slopes of which we are doing all our chores, yet not realize so, and given that we have taken into grant, some of its most ill quoted saying, such as quantum mechanics pertains to the small and it must only add up a ferociously small error.

The truth is some of its often quoted remarks such as, Feynman’s; safe to say nobody understands quantum mechanics and so on, are a mere metaphor, in circumstances where further insights of quantum mechanics are tangible and NOT inconsistent with the rules of quantum mechanics.

Although such is unlikely to come in a decade, impressive strides are possible in 5 decades and truly comprehensive knowledge is possible in several centuries to a millennium’s time. 

This is quite inconsiderately absent from the way we teach our notions of the modern world and from the way we often discuss the true concepts of quantum mechanics. One of the rule is, anything said about anything is anyhow true. Watch out before applying that seemingly innocuous rule of quantum mechanics. The constraint is it must not be inconsistent with another rule, which may be subtle enough.

The rule for the physicists is, shut up and compute. They usually do that.

When it comes to some of the most famous rules of quantum mechanics, such as Feynman Diagrams that’s amply reflected, you take care of all the diagrams, that are possible. And discard the ones that you can see right away as meaningless.

Quantum mechanics is as simple as that, when stated, when you compute you know it’s a pain in the neck and possibly everywhere. I have a tremendous backache from a couple days, can I assign that to some of the principles of quantum mechanics. Well, possibly, I was trying to compute when I was sleeping, that’s when I shut up the most.

The small computations of small Feynman diagrams possibly meant I was trying all possible topological positions my body can take while trying to see what possible histories the electron takes. Everyone must pay a tribute to Feynman while sleeping, because he slept a lot less for some of the inventions he made or made possible for all of us. Every competitive physicist realizes this.

Nature is an immensely complex, gigantic and subtle rulebook. There are plenty of rules everywhere and quantum mechanics posits that we understand and apply a few of them in everything we observe and we see the brilliant way nature works into itself.

I was thinking of a simple problem of a gunshot. Lets see how many angles there are, to this phenomenon.

The bullet that’s shot may have a little imprecise tip, say a few mm’s and this could cause it to spin and wobble a lot, before it reaches a quarter of a furlong.

The iron may be impure and mixed in an unspecified manner and may have a different specific gravity and moment of inertia than specified.

The weather may be turbulent. The way we thought it propagates through air may be a little jumbled up. Very little and who knows where the bullet actually ends up.

Well quantum mechanics as such does not play any role here but this is called complexity. Physicists often try to describe complexity through an understanding called chaos.

Now the way we shoot the bullet may be mechanized through a digital camera or a focusing lens. This is where quantum mechanics may play some of its weird prongs. Quantum mechanics needs to be understood in its entirety as much as it can be and be applied to situations for a complete stalk of any situation as far as Physics goes, may be a Monte-Carlo be developed here may be a few pot shots be taken real time and the data and image studied carefully.

This is the way Physics needs to be performed, if we were to see the complete implications of our understanding of the vast world.

Without that it’s just farcical and Topsy-Turvy.


  1. I disagree with you on the last sentence, people perform and learn things differently. Some can see everything in such simplicity that your complexity does not come close to reality while their simplicity does. Nothing should only be done a certain way, choice and the ability to f*k up is what drives progress. Without risk no rewards exist.


    • I don’t know how you can fuck up a 500 Volt electric lines without taking the power off. But the sense in which I said the last sentences was to mean, don’t just copy whats written in the text books of physics rather be inventive about it, who is stopping you from performing it in any GOD damn way you want it, except you have to come up with something sensible. Lets not go into what brings progress, there are a lot of articles in this site and a few of them are towards the issues of progress, development and understanding of our world.


  2. Pingback: The nature of quantum mechanics. « Invariance Publishing House

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s